Consumer Law

Florencia Marotta-Wurgler Study of EULAs

By Jeff Sovern

Florencia Marotta-Wurgler of NYU has written "'Unfair' Dispute Resolution Clauses: Much Ado About Nothing?" in Boilerplate: Foundations of Market Contracts (Omri Ben-Shahar, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2007), analyzing dispute resolution clauses in end user license agreements.  Here's the abstract:

Dispute resolution clauses are a common and potentially important component of many types of standard form contracts. I examine the use of dispute resolution clauses in 597 end-user license agreements (EULAs) of software packages sold online. I find that 75% of EULAs include choice of law clauses, 28% include forum selection clauses, 6% include arbitration clauses, and none include class action waivers. Sellers are equally likely to include dispute resolution clauses in the EULAs of consumer-oriented and business-oriented products. Despite the concerns of some legal academics, I do not find much evidence of "strategic" use of DRCs to advantage sellers over buyers. For example, sellers located in states with "seller-friendly" laws are no more likely to include choice of law or choice of forum clauses than sellers in states with stronger consumer protections; despite UCITA's flexible choice-of-law rules and otherwise seller-friendly provisions, sellers do not go out of their way to select UCITA; and, there is no evidence that fora selected are intentionally inconvenient to buyers. These results question certain proposals to regulate dispute resolution clauses in consumer form contracts on the basis of strategic behavior by sellers.

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on July 02, 2008 (boomark / email).