Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Benefits & ERISA Law Blogs -> Pension Protection Act Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Benefits & ERISA Law
: Pension Protection Act BlogQualified Transportation Fringe Benefits from More than One Employer
By Suzanne Wynn
For an employee working two jobs, can they receive qualified transportation fringe benefits from each employer? With more employers adding transit and parking benefits for their employees, and more employees working multiple jobs, this question keeps popping up.
The answer to this question is generally “yes” - an employee working two jobs can receive qualified transportation fringe benefits from each employer. How much depends on whether the employers are related or not. If the employers are related, the employee can receive benefits from both employers up to the monthly statutory dollar limit. If the employers are not related, the employee is not limited by the monthly statutory dollar limit.
For example, assume that the employee’s monthly parking expense is $500 per month, and the employee works for two different employers, both of whom provide qualified transportation fringe benefits which include a qualified parking benefit. In Rev. Proc. 2007-66, the IRS announced the monthly limit for parking expenses is $220. If the employers are unrelated, the employee can receive $220 from each employer. If the employers are related, the employee is limited to a combined benefit of $220 from both employers. If the employers are related, any excess the employee receives above the $220 monthly limit is taxable to the employee for income and employment tax purposes.
The examples to Treas. Reg. 1.132-9(b), Q&A-10, state:
(b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of this Q/A-10:
Example (1). (i) During a year in which the statutory monthly qualified parking limit is $175, Employee E works for Employers M and N, who are unrelated and not treated as a single employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o). Each month, M and N each provide qualified parking benefits to E with a value of $100.
(ii) In this Example 1, because M and N are unrelated employers, and the value of the monthly parking benefit provided by each is not more than the applicable statutory monthly limit, the parking benefits provided by each employer are excludable as qualified transportation fringes assuming that the other requirements of this section are satisfied.
Example (2). (i) Sames facts as in Example 1, except that Employers M and N are treated as a single employer under section 414(b).
(ii) In this Example 2, because M and N are treated as a single employer, the value of the monthly parking benefit provided by M and N must be combined for purposes of determining whether the applicable statutory monthly limit has been exceeded. Thus, the amount by which the value of the parking benefit exceeds the monthly limit ($200 minus the monthly limit amount of $175 equals $25) for each month in the year is includible in E’s wages for income and employment tax purposes.
Additional Information:
- IRS FAQ on the Community Renewal Act of 2000
Technorati Tags: Pension Protection Act, ppa, parking, qualified transportation, 132(f)(4), ERISA
Full post as published by Pension Protection Act Blog on January 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 3
Other Benefits
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 4
Where to get help
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 2
Training, Healthcare, and Death Benefits
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
John Vermillion and Associates LLC et al.
allegedly misrepresented themselves as qualified financial advisers to sell living trusts and exploit senior citizens.
Jevic Transportation
allegedly failing to give 60 days warning before closing plant.
Transit Technicians Scam
Two Municipal Transportation Agency agree to pay $287,000 settlement for stealing money from fare boxes.
Social Security Loses Class Action, Will Pay $500 Million in Benefits
Social Security Loses Class Action, Will Pay $500 Million in Benefits
Retired Steel Workers Win Pension Benefits Class Action for $51 Million
Retired Steel Workers Win Pension Benefits Class Action for $51 Million

FRINGE BENEFITS AND 2% SHAREHOLDERS OF S CORPORATIONS
Black: Fringe Benefits Tax and the Company Car: Aligning the Tax with Environmental Policy
SPLIT SCT HOLDS CONTRIBUTIONS TO RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS NOT PART OF WORKERS' COMP. AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE
Qualified Retirement Plan Benefits Treatise
Online Resources: Employment Law and Pregnancy Discrimination
The variety of benefits for in-house counsel









