ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer

Trade Secrets: Another Case of Departing Employee Problems - Colorado This Time

ADVERTISEMENTS
Green Patent Blog's Court Orders Ex-Xantrex Veep to Stop Solar Inverter Work for Competitor contains a longish report on this case. By now the factual basis ought to be so commonplace as not to need mentioning:

Xantrex?s complaint (xantrex.pdf) alleged that Thompson breached his employment agreement by leaving Xantrex and immediately starting employment with AE (the non-compete provision prohibited Thompson from working for any competitor within one year of leaving Xantrex). Thompson worked on solar inverter technology at Xantrex, and AE entered the solar inverter market shortly before Thompson joined AE.

While at Xantrex, Thompson was Vice President of Engineering and Product Development and had access to the company?s confidential information. According to the complaint, Thompson had played a leading role in acquiring and integrating certain cutting edge solar inverter technology into Xantrex?s products.

About trade secrets, I found this paragraph particularly interesting:

As to success on the merits of the trade secrets claim, Judge Daniel found enough evidence that the confidential information accessed by Thompson prior to leaving Xantrex rises to the level of trade secrets (e.g., solar inverter product development information and data on the benefits of various product features). The court also found that Thompson?s rapid accessing of trade secret documents just before leaving Xantrex was of particular concern because his ready recollection of possible trade secrets would make their use by AE possible without him actually telling anyone. In other words, Thompson?s mere knowledge of the information would make misappropriation likely.

While only a decision on a motion to dismiss and a motion for preliminary injunction, I still find it interesting if only for providing another detail to the following lessons:
  1. Protect your trade secrets - it is cheaper than litigation.
  2. Hiring a high profile employee from a competitor is an invitation to a lawsuit that will likely to be successful.
  3. Hiring a high profile employee from a competitor with a non-compete agreement is an even greater invitation to a lawsuit that will likely to be successful.

Full post as published by Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer on June 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.019 secs (new cache)