Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comSexual Harassment in California: A Twofer
By Peter Lattman
How about a little sexual-harassment litigation as we head into the three-day holiday weekend? A couple of cases out in California had us choking on our Cheerios this morning.
First, a California appeals court overturned a $1.5 million verdict awarded to a woman who was spanked in front of co-workers. Her employers called it team-building exercise. She called it sexual harassment. In 2006, a jury agreed and punished the company with a $1 million punitive damage award.
But this week a state appeals court overturned the verdict. Why? Because the judge didn’t properly instruct the jury on the relevant issue: Was she spanked because she was a woman? The company, Alarm One, had argued since it spanked both male and female employees, there was no harassment. The spanking was part of a team building exercise for its sales force — winners also reported made the losers wear diapers and fed them baby food. (We hope there are writers from The Office who kill time reading this blog while on strike.)
If you think that’s amusing, try this one on for size. The LAT, via Overlawyered, reported on the latest sexual-harassment suit set to go to trial next week against Dov Charney (pictured), the controversial wunderkind owner of clothing chain American Apparel. (Click here for a New Yorker article on Charney by Malcolm Gladwell.) Charney has been sued four times for sexual harassment (one dismissal, two settled) for, er, unusual behavior.
Like wearing underwear around the office. Or walking around naked wearing only a sock to cover his genitals. He denies creating a hostile work environment and in depositions he has explained away his behavior, saying that during the plaintiff’s employment he “frequently had been in my underpants . . . because I was designing an underwear line.” He added: “I’m very proud of the underwear.” As for the sock, he says that he was considering it as a product and he “was in fit condition for it.”
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on January 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Sexual Harassment Policy
Define harassment, outline complaint procedure
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Sexual Harassment
(in the workplace)
Jury Awards $2 Million in Sexual Harassment Wrongful Termination Suit
Jury Awards $2 Million in Sexual Harassment Wrongful Termination Suit
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Student Harassment
Wichita School District pays $45,000 settlement for high school students' harassment lawsuit.
Victim of Sexual Attack Awarded $1.4 Million
Victim of Sexual Attack Awarded $1.5 Million
Catholic Archdiocese
Will Pay $12.6 Million in Sexual Abuse Settlements

Sexual Harassment: A Strange, Vague "Tort"
Leading California Professor Suspended Over Refusal to Take Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training
Teen Girls the subject of Sexual Harassment
Workplace sexual harassment survey results








