Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Law Observer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP Law ObserverInjunction Prohibiting Use of Unidentified Trade Secrets Was Too Vague
A preliminary injunction in a trade secret and copyright case enjoined a defendant from "[u]sing, copying, disclosing, converting, appropriating, retaining, selling, transferring, or otherwise exploiting Patriot?s copyrights, confidential information, trade secrets, or computer files."
The Seventh Circuit held that this injunction was impermissibly vague and did not meet the requirements of Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the injunction be specific in its terms and describe in reasonable detail the acts sought to be restrained.
Full post as published by IP Law Observer on January 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.

Seventh Circuit: Injunction against use of plaintiff's copyrights and trade secrets too vague
Preliminary Injunction Affirmed Based on Noncompete Agreement but not Trade Secrets
7th Cir - Injunction did not adequately specify trade secrets
West Legal Education Center Trade Secrets Courses
COA Dismisses TSPA Claim For Indefinite Pleading








