Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Election-Campaign Law Blogs -> Election Updates
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Election-Campaign Law
: Election UpdatesCRS report, "The Constitutionality of Requiring Photo Identification for Voting."
ADVERTISEMENTS
Recently the CRS released a report, "The Constitutionality of Requiring Photo Identification for Voting: An Analysis of Crawford v. Marion County Election Board." The report concludes by asserting the following implications of the Crawford decision:
In the wake of the Supreme Court?s ruling in Crawford, some commentators have speculated that more states are likely to enact laws requiring photo identification for voting. However, even though the Court?s ruling strikes down a facial challenge to
Indiana?s Voter ID Law, it appears to leave open the possibility of ?as applied? challenges to such laws, if greater evidence of the burdens imposed on voters? rights can be provided. Furthermore, while three members of the Court ? Justices Scalia, Thomas,
and Alito ? hold the position that a ?record-based? evaluation of the impact of such laws on individuals is inappropriate, that view does not appear to be shared by the remainder of the Court.
Full post as published by Election Updates on June 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Lawsuits and Settlements
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Operating Room Fires
Hundreds Injured During Surgery, New Report Shows
Tree Stands
Ardisam Inc. pays $420,000 settlement for failing to report defective product to government officials.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.










