Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The FRAUDfiles Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: The FRAUDfiles BlogFour key pieces to an effective corporate fraud investigation
By Tracy Coenen
There are four critical pieces to a corporate investigative puzzle. With the proliferation of stories of corporate fraud, managers and executives would be wise to familiarize themselves with the workings of a corporate fraud investigation.
A corporate investigative policy is necessary because it is important to have guidelines in place for the start of an investigation. What should management do when fraud is suspected? How are fraud allegations to be evaluated? When and why does the company initiate a full-blown investigation?
Most managers and executive haven?t had to deal with allegations of serious fraud. They need some guidance so that evidence isn?t corrupted and so that the allegations are handled fairly. A well-designed policy will help avoid claims of selective treatment. It also brings uniformity to the process so that similar offenses are treated similarly.
The investigative team will carry out the full fraud investigation. Depending on the seriousness of the allegations and the level of examination required, the team could be as few as one or two people, or as many as dozens of people. The team might include: attorney, fraud examiner or forensic accountant, auditor, private investigator, computer consultant, and a management representative.
A properly managed fraud investigation is critical to the successful resolution of a corporate fraud. Included in the responsibility for management of the investigation are: document management procedures and supervision of staff and consultants. The key is being able to quickly locate critical documents, and ensuring that all necessary issues are examined.
Every fraud investigation is unique, since each fraud has its own set of facts and details. The purpose of the investigation should be to determine whether or not a fraud occurred, who was responsible for it, and how much was lost to the fraud. Evidence of the findings must be gathered and presented to those who need to know, such as the lead attorney, upper management, and the board of directors.
Copyright © 2008 Sequence Inc. All rights reserved.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
d8e155abd66dfea6417f56f6831614fa)
Full post as published by The FRAUDfiles Blog on May 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
How to Skirt H-1B Regulations
Senator reacts to YouTube video
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
H&R Block Retirement Plan Fraud
How to Join Class Action Suit
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
McAfee, Symantec
Settle Investigation into Automatic Antivirus Subscription Practices
Schering Plough, Merck
Settle Multi-State Investigation for $5.4 Million
Verizon To Pay $52 Million To Settle
Verizon To Pay $52 Million To Settle "Pay as You Go" Data Charges FCC Investigation

Government's Mortgage Fraud Crackdown
DOJ's New Charging Guidelines in Corporate Fraud Prosecutions
Countrywide Financial under securities fraud investigation: report
Update on Alleged Tax Fraud by GE Subsidiary in Brazil
Who Gets to Decide Whether to Continue An Investigation
"Early Voting: Boon for Fraud, Bust for Deliberative Democracy"









