ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex CrimesDorf on Williams
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
I hope everyone had a nice Memorial Day weekend. I took some extra time off after fulfilling my best man duties at my best friend's wedding. So, I have a lot of catching up to do today.
First up is a post by Michael Dorf concerning the decision in US v. Williams:Herewith, a few observations, beginning with the silly and moving to what I intend as a serious policy proposal....
3) Dissenting in Monday's case, Justice Souter (joined by Justice Ginsburg) said that a pandering charge for virtual child porn also outruns the justification for the underlying prohibition. Is he right about that? I'm not sure, but it does strike me that both the majority and the dissent missed an important aspect of the issue.I can think of two justifications for the law even in instances where a person offers kiddie porn, but no actual child pornography exists...continue to full postFull post as published by Sex Crimes on May 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Sherwin-Williams
Recalls Krylon UV Fabric Protector due to Respiratory Hazard
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Barnett on Dorf, Part Two (More on Living Constitutionalism)
More blog posts on AALS Hot Topic Panel on Gonzales v. Carhart








