ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog

Court Cannot Choose Between Two Reasonable Interpretations on a Motion to Dismiss

By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Monier, Inc. v. Boral Lifetile, Inc., (Del. Ch., May 13, 2008), read letter opinion here, the Chancery Court relied on prior precedent to hold that on a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), it could not choose between two (or more) reasonable interpretations of an Operating Agreement. Thus, even if the plaintiff's interpretation did not ultimately prevail at trial, at the motion to dismiss stage it would be premature to favor one interpretation over the other.

Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on May 25, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (new cache)