ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Legal Juice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Legal Juice

The $341,000 Fly?

By John Mesirow

ADVERTISEMENTS

the%20fly%20sign%20movie.jpg

Just like the McDonald's coffee case (PLEASE click here to read the incredible truth about that case, not the BS put out by business groups and the insurance companies), I'm sure that, though the facts are bizarre, Mr. Mustapha's injuries are real and quite serious. Here's what happened, per canada.com:

Mustapha came to Canada from Lebanon in 1976 when he was 16 years old. A decade later, a Culligan Canada representative convinced him to keep a cooler of water in his home, which he was told was particularly beneficial for pregnant women and children. The family bought into the idea in a big way - keeping only Culligan water in their home for the next 15 years.
That all changed in 2001 after the fly incident. Mustapha said he could not get it out of his mind. He said he felt nauseous and suffered abdominal pain. He started avoided all things having to do with water - even drinking it and taking showers. He sought psychological treatment and medication.
"He pictures flies walking on animal feces or rotten food and then being in his supposedly pure drinking water," [Trial] Justice John Brockenshire, of the Ontario Superior Court, wrote in his 2005 ruling. While acknowledging the reaction seemed to be "objectively bizarre," Brockenshire stressed that Mustapha's obsession with cleanliness and predisposed aversion to insects explained his disorder.
At the trial level, Mr. Mustapha was awarded $341,000. Culligan appealed ... and won. Mr. Mustapha appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada and ... lost.
"I conclude that the loss suffered by the plaintiff was too remote to be reasonably foreseen and that consequently, he cannot recover damages from the defendant," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the 9-0 ruling.
Click here to read more.

Full post as published by Legal Juice on May 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0178 secs (new cache)