Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Cairns Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Cairns BlogJapan Announces Launch of Peer to Patent
By Beth Simone Noveck and students.
IBM Japan, Ltd., Fujitsu Ltd., and other major IT companies plan to
utilize outside specialists? expertise for patent registration. These
companies will use a new patent examination system initiated by the
Japan Patent Office (JPO) in June on a trial basis to have researchers
and other experts who are knowledgeable about cutting-edge technology
check whether their own inventions are suitable for patent
registration. The aim is to reduce the risk of patents becoming
invalid because prior literature or other evidence is discovered after
they are registered.
The new system adopted by the JPO is called ?Community Patent Review.? It covers disclosed patent applications chosen by IBM Japan or other companies after 18 months have passed since they were filed. The JPO will recruit several hundred participants, including university researchers, to have them express their opinions about the trends for the latest papers presented at overseas academic conferences, the existence or absence of prior literature, and other issues, and it will make use of those opinions for patent examinations.
Ricoh Co., Ltd. also plans to use the new system. Users of the new system can reduce the risk of another company claiming that a patent that has been obtained is invalid, and they may also be able to carry out licensing negotiations that are favorable to them. This year dozens of patent applications centered on IT-related software and network technologies are expected to undergo examinations.
Currently, JPO examiners use databases to
closely investigate prior cases Japan and overseas, such as existing
patents and academic papers, and examine the novelty of patent
applications. However, as an official of the JPO?s examination policy
planning section noted, the examiners ?cannot fully investigate
academic papers and manuals that are not included in databases.? In
2006, there were 194 patents that became invalid because they were
found to lack novelty.
The JPO will compile the results on the new system by the end of this year. If it considers the new system to be effective, the JPO will call on more businesses to use it in the next fiscal year and thereafter.
Full post as published by Cairns Blog on May 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
Exotic Meats USA
Announces Urgent Statewide Recall of Elk Tenderloin
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Energy Price Gouging
Inergy Propane announces refunds to customers as part of lawsuit settlement.
CoServe Electric
Members Launch Class Action

USPTO extends peer review program to business method patents
Peer-to-patent Increases Prior Art Submissions
Is patenthawk snarky on peer-to-patent







