Intellectual Property Law

Eleventh Circuit combs over copyright law, idea-expression dichotomy in affirming noninfringement

By McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.

In a decision this week, the Eleventh Circuit upheld the district court's decision granting summary judgment of no copyright infringement to individuals and entities associated with two Trump buildings and denying the plaintiff leave to file a third amended complaint.  In this regard, the court affirmed a finding that no reasonable, properly instructed jury could find substantial similarity between the plaintiff's copyrighted architectural designs and the design, development, and construction of two Trump Buildings in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida.  To conclude otherwise, the court explained, would require a finding the plaintiff owned a copyright in the concept of particular building design features rather than the particular expression of those design features, a conclusion that would improperly extend the protections of copyright law well beyond their proper scope.
 
More concerning Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures, L.C. after the jump.

[More]

Full post as published by FileWrapper on May 16, 2008 (boomark / email).