Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyNew(?) Eleventh Circuit ruling affirms two above-guideline sentences
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
As now reported by the local press and in the blogosphere, the Eleventh Circuit in US v. Williams, No. 07-12526 (11th Cir. Mar. 20, 2008) (available here), has "upheld the conviction and eight-year prison sentence of a former Coca-Cola Co. secretary found guilty of conspiring to steal trade secrets from the world's biggest beverage company." Ellen Podgor's post summarizes sentencing highlights from Williams:Williams received [an above guidelines] 96-month sentence, in sharp contrast to a sentence given to an individual who plead guilty and received a 24-month sentence. The 11th Circuit held that giving enormous weight to one factor ? in this case the seriousness of the offense ? does not mean the sentence is unreasonable...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on May 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Coca-Cola Trade Secrets Case
Major Eleventh Circuit ruling on reach of crack retroactivity
appellate procedure in the Eleventh Circuit







