Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Alabama Appellate WatchJudgment Which Did Not Address Issue Joined by Parties Was Not Final
A circuit court’s judgment was not final, and would not support an appeal, where the judgment did not address the husband’s request to end his obligation to maintain life insurance for his ex-wife’s benefit. Hennaing v. Hennaing, No. 2060530 (Ala. Civ. App. May 9, 2008). The appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The circuit court entered a judgment which reduced the husband’s monthly alimony obligation and awarded the wife an arrearage for past-due alimony. The judgment did not address an issue the parties had joined: namely, the husband’s request that he no longer be obligated to maintain a life insurance policy naming the wife as beneficiary. From this judgment the parties appealed.
The Court of Civil Appeals ruled that the order appealed from was not final and did not yield appellate jurisdiction. “Although neither party argue[d] that the failure of the trial court to make a ruling on the life-insurance issue” impacted the appellate court’s jurisdiction, the court noticed the jurisdictional issue ex mero motu.
“A judgment is generally not final unless all claims, or the rights and liabilities of all parties, have been resolved. The only exception to this rule of finality is when the trial court directs the entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P.” Here, because the trial court did not rule on the life-insurance issue, “one of the claims of the parties remain[ed] unresolved.” “We cannot,” the court wrote, “despite the urging of each party, decide which result the trial court intended by its silence on the issue. Because the appeals are from a nonfinal judgment, we dismiss the appeals.”Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on May 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

Duration of Proceedings and Joined Cases C-120/06 P & C-121/06 P
Saffran Final Judgment Upped to $501 Million Against Boston Scientific
SCO Makes Its Move in Utah: Asks to Waive Claims, Get Final Judgment - Updated, as text
Novell files in Utah its opposition in SCO's motion for final judgment
GA: Rent from Award of Permanent Possession of Real Estate Must Be Divided








