Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawDivision of Human Rights to determine validity of a ?release? signed by an employee alleging unlawful discriminatory practice
Division of Human Rights to determine validity of a ?release? signed by an employee alleging unlawful discriminatory practice
Freeman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 04348, Decided on May 6, 2008, Appellate Division, Second Department
On August 7, 2007, the New York State Division of Human Rights[SDHR] dismissed the Terrance Freeman?s complaint, finding that there was no probable cause to believe that Freeman?s employer, Nortel Networks, Inc., had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice. Freeman?s complaint alleged that he was the victim of a discriminatory employment practice in connection with his discharge from employment because he suffered from alcoholism. At the time of his discharge, the petitioner signed a release absolving the appellant from liability in connection therewith.
The SDHR found that alcoholism was not a disability within the meaning of the Executive Law and that it did not have jurisdiction to determine the validity of the release executed by Freeman.
In the course of the litigation that followed, SDHR asserted that its determination was erroneous because it did have jurisdiction to determine the validity of the release and alcoholism was recognized as a protected disability.
In response to Nortel?s claim that the release that Freeman had signed controlled and thus Freeman?s appeal should be dismissed, the Appellate Division held that ?The validity of the release ?cannot be conclusively determined at this time and must await the development? of the record,? citing Rimberg & Assoc., P.C. v Jamaica Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 40 AD3d 1066.
Accordingly, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly denied the Nortel?s motion to dismiss Freeman?s petition and, further, SDHR demonstrated good cause to remit this matter to it.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Baseball Players Named in Mitchell Report
Major League Baseball Players using Performance Enhancing Drugs
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
US Federal Government
allegedly violated the niversal Declaration of Human Rights by deporting undocumented parents of US born children.
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.
Employment
Employee rights including labor law, harassment, safety, unpaid overtime, discrimination and union disputes.
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation
has been accused of not doing enough to keep addicted gamblers who have signed up for a "self-exclusion" program out of casinos.

Incompetence at New York State Division of Human Rights
Inter-American rights court to hear Mexico 'dirty war' case
NYAppellate Division Attempts To Quantify How To Determine Emotional Distress Damages
Mother-in-Law Not An Employee Under NYS Human Rights Law
UN rights council elections favor 4 states criticized by rights groups








