ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employee received all retirement and salary benefits upon ordered military service

By Harvey Randall, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
Employee received all retirement and salary benefits upon ordered military service
Deem, v New York State and Local Retirement System, 44 A.D.3d 1235, App Div, 3d Dept [Motion for leave to appeal denied, Court of Appeal, Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 61017]

In January 2004, Michael A. Deem, an assistant county attorney in the City of White Plains, Westchester County, was ordered to active military duty in his capacity as a United States Marine Corps reservist. He served until January 19, 2005 and returned to work on April 4, 2005.

Claiming that he was denied retirement service credit for all time served while on active duty and that he was entitled to full pay and benefits during the time period between his discharge from military service and his return to work on April 4, 2005, Deem sued the New York State Employees? Retirement System and the City of White Plains. Supreme Court dismissed his petition and Deem appealed.

As to Deem?s claim that he did not receive the retirement credit to which he was entitled, the Appellate Division said that ?it appears that the Retirement System has indeed credited [Deem?s] retirement account for the period in question? and, therefore, as to the Retirement System, Deem?s appeal was moot.

As to Deem?s claims against the City, the court said that he had ?received all benefits that he was entitled to under applicable laws during and after his ordered military duty.? The decision indicates that Deem received a salary differential from Westchester County during his entire period of ?[ordered] active military duty? (as provided by Westchester County Act No. 224-2001 §§1 and 5) and he then received 73 days of requested leave following his discharge.

Although Deem claimed that he was entitled to be paid his full salary, as well as other benefits, during his 73-day period of leave, the Appellate Division said that Deem cited no local, state or federal law, or decisional authority to support his position and dismissed his appeal.

The text of the decision is posted at

http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2008/05/employee-received-all-retirement-and.html

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 05, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0164 secs (new cache)