ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Golf Patents

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Golf Patents

Callaway Hyper X and Hyper X Tour Added to the List of Clubs Accused of Infringing Acushnet?s Golf Club Patents

By David Dawsey PE Esq

ADVERTISEMENTS
As you may recall from a prior post, on June 8, 2007 Callaway filed a golf club patent infringement lawsuit alleging that Acushnet has willfully infringed 5 Callaway patents. Then, as discussed in a subsequent post, on July 12, 2007 Acushnet filed their Answer to the Complaint thereby stating (i) that Acushnet does not infringe the Callaway patents and alleging that the Callaway patents are invalid, and (ii) returned the favor and accusing Callaway of infringing two of Acushnet?s patents. Callaway responded at the end of August (post here) stating that they do not infringe the Acushnet patents and allege that the Acushnet patents (7041003 and 6960142) are invalid!

Now, Acushnet has filed their Second Amended Answer (read in entirety HERE) to the Callaway Complaint. As you may recall, the original Complaint alleges that King Cobra 454 Comp, King Cobra F Speed, King Cobra HS9 F Speed, King Cobra HS9 M Speed, King Cobra LD F Speed, Titleist 905R, Titleist 905S, and Titleist 905T clubs infringe one, or more, of the Callaway patents. The Answer alleges that the Callaway FT-i, FT-5, X-460, X-460 Tour, Big Bertha Fusion FT-3, and Big Bertha 460 clubs infringe one, or more, of the Acushnet patents.

The Second Amended Answer adds Callaway?s Hyper X and Hyper X Tour clubs to the list of allegedly infringing products and adds USPN 7140975 to the other two Acushnet patents that they accuse Callaway of infringing. If you like reading about golf club faces having non-concentric zones of differing flexural stiffness, then you will love the ?975 patent.

This leaves me asking myself..... does Callaway produce any drivers that Acushnet does not allege are infringing one of their patents, and does Acushnet produce any drivers that Callaway does not allege are infringing one of their patents?

David Dawsey  - Monitoring Golf Patent Infringement Litigation

PS ? I just noticed that the Callaway website states that they have over 1,100 patents; which they state is more than any of their competitors. Impressive.

PPS ? the prior posts concerning the Callaway v. Acushnet golf club lawsuit include:

a) Callaway Sues Acushnet Again? This Time for Infringement of 5 Golf Club Patents  -  here

b) Acushnet Answers Callaway?s Complaint in Golf Club Patent Infringement Case? Acushnet Turns the Tables and Sues Callaway for Infringing 2 of Acushnet?s Golf Club Patents  -  here

c) The Ongoing Saga of Callaway and Acushnet? 1st Callaway Sues Alleging Infringement of 5 Patents? Then Acushnet Returns the Favor and Sues Alleging Infringement of 2 Patents and Asserting Invalidity? NOW Today Callaway Responds - here


Full post as published by Golf Patents on April 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)