ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> Oklahoma Family Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Family Law

: Oklahoma Family Law Blog

Still More on Flat Fees in Contested Divorces

By Dan Nunley, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

This week I have been posting regarding my opinion as to the benefits of attorneys charging a flat fee instead of billing by the hour in contested divorce cases.  Today I would like to share what South Carolina family law attorney Ben Stevens has to say about the issue:   

The American Bar Association released a report just over five years ago that was very critical of the ?standard? way that many (if not most) attorneys charge their clients for their services.  Its conclusion was that ?[t]he billable hour is fundamentally about quantity over quality, repetition over creativity.?  To me, that doesn't sound like it contributes at all to what should be the attorney's ultimate goal -- providing clients with the best possible service.

Approximately two years ago, I began handling all family law cases on a fixed fee basis instead of charging by the hour as I had done for many years.  When a client hires an attorney on an hourly basis, that client is basically writing the attorney a blank check and crossing his/her fingers hoping that the total fees are what he/she anticipated.  I know that if I was the client, I would definitely prefer the certainty of knowing the total cost instead of hoping for the best.

Specifically, I believe that clients receive the following benefits from hiring attorneys for a fixed fee:

  • Clients know the total cost up front, which enables them to determine prior to retaining the attorney whether or not they can afford his/her services and to budget for the attorney's fees and costs. 
       
  • Clients have another basis upon which to compare attorneys, both in the manner they charge for their services (fixed fee vs. hourly) as well as the amount charged ($X vs. $Y).
       
  • Clients never end up in fee disputes with their attorneys, because all fees were negotiated and agreed upon before the representation began.
  • This method encourages open communication from the client to the attorney.  In hourly billing situations, clients sometimes hesitate to provide information to the attorney because they know that they will incur fees and costs for doing so.
  • Clients have a higher level of trust with their lawyers, which results in a better working relationship, which frequently yields better outcomes in the clients' cases.

Source: South Carolina Family Law Blog.

Full post as published by Oklahoma Family Law Blog on December 12, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.018 secs (new cache)