ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime and ConsequencesReading tea leaves in the Baze sequels
By Kent Scheidegger et al.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Last Friday, this post at Capital Defense Weekly said, "Monday’s order list will give a better understanding of which challenges may or may not meet the plurality’s standard." Yes, I think so. Over at SCOTUSblog, Lyle Denniston writes, "The Supreme Court, without a specific explanation of why it was doing so, chose a single path on Monday in dealing with" a slew of capital cases. The number of capital cases the Court turned down is reported as 11 by Lyle and by an AP story. However, I count 14, including a rehearing denial. The cases are listed at the end of this post.
Lyle seems surprised that the Court gave no explanation for its actions. I do not find this remarkable. The Court usually does not give a reason for denial of certiorari...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime and Consequences on April 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Fume Event
Leaves Airline Attendant Sick
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Analysis: The Baze sequels — a single pattern
Baze Commentary: Protocol and Practice
Deborah Denno on the Baze Ruling
Three months after Baze, has anything really changed








