Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People

Copyright Law

: Recording Industry vs The People

More discovery issues in UMG v. Lindor, with strong differences between the facts as presented by Messrs. Gabriel and Beckerman

By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman

In UMG v. Lindor, during the telephone conference conducted on April 3rd concerning MediaSentry's refusal to respond to its subpoena duces tecum, it was determined that defendant's lawyer would write a letter listing other unrelated discovery issues that had arisen.

Following are the letter he sent, Mr. Gabriel's response, and defendant's reply.

[Ed. note. The astute reader might notice a slight factual discrepancy or two between Mr. Gabriel's "recollection" of events, and the emails that he actually sent and received.]

April 7, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (8 discovery issues)*
April 9, 2008, Letter of Richard L. Gabriel (8 discovery issues)*
Exhibit A (email string)*
April 9, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. Robert M. Levy (8 discovery issues)*
Exhibit A (4 email strings)*

* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation

(Contributions are tax deductible)

Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property

To contribute to Marie Lindor's legal defense, see below.

The above donation button links to a PayPal account established by Marie Lindor's family for people who may wish to make financial contributions to Ms. Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. Lindor. Contributions are not tax deductible.

Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on April 09, 2008 (boomark / email).