ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Energy Law Blogs -> The Energy Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Energy Law

: The Energy Law Blog

Taxation of Fuel Provided to Compression Service Operators at No Cost

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Bridges v. Production Operators, Inc., 2007-0648 (La. App. 4th Cir. 12/12/07),974 So.2d 54, at issue was whether the provision of fuel by customers to a compression services operator at no cost for use in powering the operator’s compressors was subject to Louisiana sales or use tax. 

 Production Operators, Inc. (“POI”) operated a gas compression company and used customer-supplied fuel to power its compressors. For its services, POI received a flat monthly fee, regardless of whether its compressors were used, and customers were required to provide compressor fuel at no cost to POI. The Louisiana Department of Revenue contended that the provision of compressor fuel to POI by its customers was a taxable sale in the form of a barter. POI defended against the collection of tax by arguing that there was no transfer of title to the fuel, and to the extent there was a transfer of title, POI did not owe tax because the “sales price” and “cost” of the fuel was zero. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the Department on the first issue, concluding that the transfer of compressor fuel from the customers to the operator constituted a taxable sale in the form of a barter for consideration, but the court did not agree that Henry Hub spot price was the appropriate value of the consideration and instead remanded the matter to the trial court to determine the amount of the consideration for tax purposes.

            The Fourth Circuit’s decision in Production Operators, Inc. creates a split among Louisiana courts, for in 2003, the Third Circuit, considering similar facts, held that, though the provision of compressor fuel constituted a taxable transaction, because there was neither a sales price nor value for the compressor fuel, the Department could not recover any tax. Hanover Compressor Company v. Department of Revenue, 02-0925 (La. App. 3d Cir. 2/5/03), 838 So.2d 876. Production Operators, Inc. also leaves open the question of how consideration is to be determined when fuel is supplied to power gas compression operations at no cost tothe operator.

Full post as published by The Energy Law Blog on April 17, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 13:05:46)