ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Appellate Law and Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Appellate Law and Practice

CA1: ERISA, the ADA and pro ses

By S. COTUS

ADVERTISEMENTS

Femino v. NFA Corporation, Nos. 07-2178, 07-2179 (unpublished).  This is a pro se ERISA case.  I guess I could just stop there.  However, the reasoning is more of a civ pro issue. The First says that the issue is precluded by earlier actions. 

She also raised an ADA claim, which was that a limitation on benefits to people with self-reported symptoms had a disproportionate impact, but she could only muster evidence from her own case.

Full post as published by Appellate Law and Practice on April 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0315 secs (new cache)