Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Second Circuit Sentencing Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Second Circuit Sentencing BlogFailure To Fulfill "Open Court" Requirement Not Plain Error
United States v. Espinoza, Docket No. 05-0711-cr (2d Cir. Jan. 11, 2008) (found here )
The PSR included a 4 level role enhancement in Espinoza's advisory Guidelines range. At the sentencing hearing, his counsel asserted that no role enhancement should be applied but offered no evidence in support of the position. Before imposing sentence, the Court asked if there were any objections or additions to the PSR, and Espinoza stated that he had none. Accordingly, the district court imposed the sentence recommended by the PSR (360 months imprisonment) and, in its written judgment, noted that had adopted the PSR and the PSR's advisory Guidelines recommendation without change.
On appeal, Espinoza contended that his failure to object to adoption of the 4 level role enhancement at sentencing should be excused because district court did not state that at the sentencing hearing that it was indeed applying that role enhancement (it only did so in its written judgment). The Second Circuit, however, found that:
It was clear from the arguments and the sentencing range discussed at the sentencing hearing, the PSR's application of the role enhancement to calculate the particular range under discussion, and the District Court's imposition of a sentence within that same range that the District Court had applied the role enhancement in question.
But that doesn't settle it because "while the adoption of the PSR in the written judgment satisfies a district court's obligation to make specific findings, it does not satisfy the additional requirement that the district court, 'at the time of sentencing, . . . state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence.'"
The Second Circuit chastised the district court for failing to do so -- "It should have done so irrespective of whether Espinoza lost the ability to challenge the District Court's error on appeal by failing to interpose a timely objection before that Court" -- but found that the district court's failure to do so was not plain error.
Full post as published by Second Circuit Sentencing Blog on January 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Language Requirements for Citizenship
Naturalization without an English language test
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Nationwide Recall Of All Lots Of Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap
Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap All Lots Recalled Nationally
Wegmans Food Market
alleging the retailer revealed too much information on their credit and debit card receipts, violating the FACTA law, and leaving customers open to identity theft
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm Failure
Trasylol
allegedly causing kidney and heart failure.

Plain Error Applied Despite Gov't Failure to Allege Defendant Failed to Preserve Error
Failure To Claim Prejudice Destroys Plain Error Argument
Carruth: Failure to give Defendant Right to Allocute is Plain Error
Admitting Certificate of Nonexistence of Record Not Plain Error in Reentry Case
New Sentencing Required Because District Court Presumed GL Sentence Was Reasonable







