Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Second Opinions

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Federal Judiciary

: Second Opinions

Inculpatory testimony by police officer as to the statement of a third party is not admissible

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Second Circuit, in Orlando v. Nassau County District Attorney?s Office, a habeas action, the Second Circuit held that the state trial court had erred in allowing a police officer to testify that the defendant in a related case had told him that Orlando had hired him to kill Bobby Calabrese. The defendant in the related case had not testified in Orlando?s case. Orlando had argued that allowing the police officer to testify violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause. The district court had held that because the testimony was not offered for the truth, but for a collateral reason (to explain a change in Orlando?s story), allowing the police officer did not violate Orlando?s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right. (The district court had issued an instruction to the jury that the testimony should not be considered to show that Orlando had hired the other defendant to kill Calabrese.) The district court issued a certificate of appealability. The Second Circuit held that the limiting instruction was not sufficient when testimony directing incriminating Orlando was given.

The Second Circuit's decision can be found here.

Full post as published by Second Opinions on February 11, 2019 (boomark / email).