Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyAlleged Defamation of Estranged Wife Leads to Order Not to Talk About Her, Loss of Gun Rights; Court of Appeal Reverses
By Eugene Volokh
The case is In re Marriage of Mendlowitz. The alleged slanders were an e-mail and a letter to the estranged wife?s business associates that seemed likely to interfere with her business relationships. They might indeed have led to a successful defamation lawsuit, and a lawsuit for interference with business relations. But a trial court judge went so far as to issue a domestic restraining order against such comments:
[Y]ou are disturbing the peace of the petitioner.... You have, by your own testimony, admitted to the defaming comments that you have made in these emails. And so therefore, the court is going to grant a restraining order for the next five years. You are not to contact [the wife], [her] employers, [her] potential employers in regard to [her] ... You are not to contact any third parties in regard to [the wife], her reputation, her past acts.
This meant that any prohibited speech about his wife would be a crime. And because the order included boilerplate language ordering the estranged husband not to ?harass, attack, strike, threaten, assault (sexually or otherwise), hit, follow, stalk, molest, destroy personal property, disturb the peace, keep under surveillance, or block movements,? the federal ban on gun possession by people who are the targets of restraining orders kicked in. (See PDF pp. 61?65 of my Implementing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Self-Defense article.)
Fortunately, the California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court?s decision, concluding that this sort of alleged defamation isn?t sufficient to justify issuing such an order. Unfortunately, for the nearly two years between the trial court decision and the appellate decision, defendant had been entirely deprived of his Second Amendment rights, and been subjected to a prior restraint in violation of his First Amendment rights.
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on March 28, 2011 (boomark / email).
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Domestic Violence
Women's Rights
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
Plane Crashes
alleging loss of life, debilitating injuries, loss of income, traumatic stress.
Helicopter Crashes
alleging loss of life, debilitating injuries, loss of income, traumatic stress.
Slimbionic, SlimDemand
Botanical Weight Loss, and One Weight Loss Pills Recalled
Windows Software
Microsoft fined $1.3 billion for failing to comply with the European Union's antitrust order.
Medtronic
Leads Failing
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions

No Fury Like a Woman Texted: Estranged Wife Nails Husband in Private Sting Operation
Stepdad cleared of abuse, can see kids again
Estranged Wife Lacked Authority to Consent to Search of Husband's Motel Room








