ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> First Amendment Center

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: First Amendment Center

6th Circuit: Man who called cop a 'fat slob' can sue over arrest

By By The Associated Press

ADVERTISEMENTS

LOUISVILLE, Ky. ? Calling a police officer a "fat slob" is not an offense that can usually get someone charged, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday, allowing a lawsuit over the arrest to go forward.

Kevin O. Kennedy sued the city of Villa Hills, Ky., and Joseph Schutzman, a police officer and building inspector, after he was arrested in May 2005 during a dispute over permits to expand a strip mall near his home.

The argument arose at the Villa Hills city building when Kennedy confronted Schutzman, according to court documents. When Schutzman refused to discuss the strip mall's permit because of pending litigation, Schutzman went into the parking lot, while Kennedy spoke with three city employees.

Later, Schutzman came back into the building and confronted Kennedy. Kennedy then called Schutzman a "fat slob," according to court documents.

Kennedy sued in 2007, shortly after charges of disturbing the peace were dismissed.

Judge Karen Nelson Moore, writing for the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, noted that Kennedy was likely yelling during the dispute. Schutzman arrested Kennedy on a charge of disorderly conduct, writing on the citation "verbal abuse in front of public works employees."

The unanimous three-judge 6th Circuit panel sent Kennedy?s lawsuit back to federal district court so his Fourth Amendment claim of wrongful arrest and First Amendment claim for retaliatory arrest could go forward.

The appeals panel found in Kennedy v. City of Villa Hills that Kennedy's hurling of the insult was legally protected speech and that, given the description of the incident in court documents, there was no cause for Kennedy's arrest.

"Indeed, because the First Amendment requires that police officers tolerate coarse criticism, the Constitution prohibits states from criminalizing conduct that disturbs solely police officers," Moore wrote.

A federal judge previously had dismissed the lawsuit against the northern Kentucky municipality.

Full post as published by First Amendment Center on March 24, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.016 secs (new cache)