Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> CL&P Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: CL&P BlogUsha Rajagopal?s traveling SLAPP suit shows need for a federal anti-SLAPP statute
By Paul Levy
by Paul Alan Levy
Usha Rajagopal, a San Francisco cosmetic surgeon, has tried to use cosmetic surgery of a legal sort to improve the appearance of her online reviews. She is under discipline by the California Medical Board because of the sloppy administration of anesthesia that put one of her patients in a vegetative state. She was also the subject of a devastating article in the San Francisco Weekly which explained that glowing reviews that helped give Rajagopal a favorable ranking on Google search for plastic surgeons in San Francisco, with five stars suggesting that her patients love her, are the product of her having hired a firm that wrote phony reviews.
Not satisfied by adding favorable reviews, Dr. Rajagopal is apparently intent on extirpating negative reviews as well. After several members of the public placed comments on Google maps about her situation, Rajagopal sued the commenters as Doe defendants, alleging defamation, in an apparent effort to remove the negative comments from her public profile.
But she did not file her suit in California, where the suit could have been subject to immediate dismissal, and possibly to an award of attorney fees under the California anti-SLAPP statute. Instead, she sued in a court near Richmond, Virginia, represented by a self-styled "Internet defamation lawyer" Domingo J Rivera, who has sent a subpoena to Google seeking to identify her critics.In a brief filed today, my Public Citizen colleague Michael Page is seeking to quash the subpoena. But this traveling SLAPP suit is just another reminder that state anti-SLAPP statutes may not provide enough protection against abusive lawsuits aimed at free speech, because the plaintiff may deliberately bring suit in a jurisdiction that does not have a strong statute protection against SLAPP suits. Only a federal anti-SLAPP statute, of the sort proposed in the last Congress by Representative Steve Cohen, will prevent such shenanigans.
Full post as published by CL&P Blog on March 07, 2011 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
NCAA Sued for Conspiracy and Anti-competitive Practices Related to Athletic Scholarships
NCAA Sued for Conspiracy and Anti-competitive Practices Related to Athletic Scholarships
New York, NY and the NYPD
alleging false arrest for violating an unconstitutional anti-loitering law.
BPA
New Study Shows Link to Diabetes and Heart Disease
Operating Room Fires
Hundreds Injured During Surgery, New Report Shows
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed

Ninth Circuit interprets Oregon's anti-SLAPP statute, dismisses appeal
Another reason why more anti-SLAPP legislation is needed
"Copyright and California's Anti-SLAPP Law"
Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Introduced In The House
Appeals Court Reverses Trial Court, Finds Anti-SLAPP Statute Applies To Reporter's Conduct







