ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> CL&P Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: CL&P Blog

Usha Rajagopal?s traveling SLAPP suit shows need for a federal anti-SLAPP statute

By Paul Levy

ADVERTISEMENTS

by Paul Alan Levy

Usha Rajagopal, a San Francisco cosmetic surgeon, has tried to use cosmetic surgery of a legal sort to improve the appearance of her online reviews.  She is under discipline by the California Medical Board because of the sloppy administration of anesthesia that put one of her patients in a vegetative state.   She was also the subject of a devastating article in the San Francisco Weekly which explained that glowing reviews that helped give Rajagopal a favorable ranking on Google search for plastic surgeons in San Francisco, with five stars suggesting that her patients love her, are the product of her having hired a firm that wrote phony reviews.  

Not satisfied by adding favorable reviews, Dr. Rajagopal is apparently intent on extirpating negative reviews as well. After several members of the public placed comments on Google maps about her situation, Rajagopal sued the commenters as Doe defendants, alleging defamation, in an apparent effort to remove the negative comments from her public profile.  

But she did not file her suit in California, where the suit could have been subject to immediate dismissal, and possibly to an award of attorney fees under the California anti-SLAPP statute.  Instead, she sued in a court near Richmond, Virginia, represented by a self-styled "Internet defamation lawyer" Domingo J Rivera, who has sent a subpoena to Google seeking to identify her critics.

In a brief filed today, my Public Citizen colleague Michael Page is seeking to quash the subpoena.   But this traveling SLAPP suit is just another reminder that state anti-SLAPP statutes may not provide enough protection against abusive lawsuits aimed at free speech, because the plaintiff may deliberately bring suit in a jurisdiction that does not have a strong statute protection against SLAPP suits.  Only a federal anti-SLAPP statute, of the sort proposed in the last Congress by Representative Steve Cohen, will prevent such shenanigans.

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on March 07, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0228 secs (new cache)