ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Marler Blog

DeFranco E. coli Hazelnut and Skippy Salmonella Peanut Butter Recall Announcement - A Side by Side Comparison

By Bill Marler, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

The FDA posts company prepared press releases each time there is a recall of product – whether there are illnesses or not.

Screen shot 2011-03-06 at 8.10.14 AM.pngHazelnut E. coli O157:H7

In the case if DeFranco Hazelnuts, the company proudly notes that the recall is 'voluntarily,' although was prompted, 'after the nut products were linked to 7 illnesses in the states of MI, MN, and WI.' However, DeFranco then notes that '[t]o-date, no E. coli O157:H7 has been detected in the nut products.' Although certainly true, when combined with DeFranco's futher warning, 'Consumers who think they may have the affected hazelnut or mixed nut products containing hazelnuts should not eat them,' seems more like a mixed message than truly helpful to consumers. Hopefully, the outbreak is over and limited to these seven people, and that the warning and recall serves the purpose.

Skippy.jpgPeanut Butter Salmonella

In Unilever United States, Inc., it announced 'a limited recall of Skippy® Reduced Fat Creamy Peanut Butter Spread and Skippy® Reduced Fat Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread, because it may be contaminated with Salmonella.' And, that '[t]he product was distributed to retail outlets in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.' It also proudly (hopefully) noted that '[t]o date, no illnesses related to this issue have been reported.'

Of course, we do hope that there are in fact no illnesses linked to Skippy Peanut Butter, but how do we know? The press release is a bit silent on when the testing was done, or why the product was apparently shipped BEFORE the test results came back (there would have been no need for a recall)? Also, was the positive Salmonella test subjected to serotyping (there are over 2,000 Salmonella species) and genetic fingerprinting so CDC PulseNet could compare the Skippy Salmonella to any ill persons who became ill after consuming it?

Perhaps that will be in the next press release posted on the FDA website?

Full post as published by Marler Blog on March 06, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0165 secs (new cache)