ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Caveat Emptor

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: Caveat Emptor

Pennsylvania Puts a Stop to Debt Buyer Robo-Signing

By Sam Glover

ADVERTISEMENTS

Post image for Pennsylvania Puts a Stop to Debt Buyer Robo-Signing

The secondary debt market—credit cards and mortgages included—has relied on made-up legal terms and suspect justifications for years in order to turn the usually slow-moving court system into a speedy tool of business. It worked, probably because few consumers put up a fight. But more people are fighting back now, which means debt buyers are scrambling for legal footing.

It isn’t working, at least not in Pennsylvania, where the state court of appeals recently said “we reject [the] ‘This is how the industry does it’ mantra.”


In Commonwealth Financial Systems v. Smith, CFS argued that it should be able to submit a Citibank credit card agreement and statements under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. But CFS swearing Citibank’s records are accurate is like swearing your neighbors tax returns are accurate. There are lot of good reasons why they should be—and probably are—but would you bet on it?

The Pennsylvania courts will not.

[W]e . . . recognize that the trial court possesses the independent obligations to preserve its judicial integrity and to jealously guard its jurisdiction. “Neither the fluidity of the secondary [debt] market, nor monetary or economic considerations of the parties, nor the convenience of the litigants supersede[s] those obligations.”

The Pennsylvania Court of Appeals was quoting from the Ohio foreclosure cases in which the Ohio U.S. District Court tossed out more than a dozen foreclosures due to “robo-signing” issues.

This is not the end of debt buyer cases, though. Or robo-signing, for that matter. In fact, we are already seeing debt buyers’ attempts to respond: form declarations from the original creditor’s custodian of records to “authenticate” the evidence. Whether or not this is sufficient as a matter of law, it will keep the debt buyers in business for a while longer.

(photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevent/3241986538/)

Related posts:

Full post as published by Caveat Emptor on February 24, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0142 secs (new cache)