Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Caveat Emptor
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: Caveat EmptorPennsylvania Puts a Stop to Debt Buyer Robo-Signing
By Sam Glover
The secondary debt market—credit cards and mortgages included—has relied on made-up legal terms and suspect justifications for years in order to turn the usually slow-moving court system into a speedy tool of business. It worked, probably because few consumers put up a fight. But more people are fighting back now, which means debt buyers are scrambling for legal footing.
It isn’t working, at least not in Pennsylvania, where the state court of appeals recently said “we reject [the] ‘This is how the industry does it’ mantra.”
In Commonwealth Financial Systems v. Smith, CFS argued that it should be able to submit a Citibank credit card agreement and statements under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. But CFS swearing Citibank’s records are accurate is like swearing your neighbors tax returns are accurate. There are lot of good reasons why they should be—and probably are—but would you bet on it?
The Pennsylvania courts will not.
[W]e . . . recognize that the trial court possesses the independent obligations to preserve its judicial integrity and to jealously guard its jurisdiction. “Neither the fluidity of the secondary [debt] market, nor monetary or economic considerations of the parties, nor the convenience of the litigants supersede[s] those obligations.”
The Pennsylvania Court of Appeals was quoting from the Ohio foreclosure cases in which the Ohio U.S. District Court tossed out more than a dozen foreclosures due to “robo-signing” issues.
This is not the end of debt buyer cases, though. Or robo-signing, for that matter. In fact, we are already seeing debt buyers’ attempts to respond: form declarations from the original creditor’s custodian of records to “authenticate” the evidence. Whether or not this is sufficient as a matter of law, it will keep the debt buyers in business for a while longer.
(photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevent/3241986538/)
Related posts:
- Robo-Signers at Debt Buyer Firms Overwhelm Courts
The foreclosure mess got messier over a month ago, when... - One Solution to Robo-Signing: De-fund Legal Aid’s Foreclosure Defense Attorneys
It turns out that a lot of mortgage servicers haven’t... - From Robo-Signing to Forgery, the Foreclosures Continue
At least robo-signers actually sign their names, even if they...
Full post as published by Caveat Emptor on February 24, 2011 (boomark / email).
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
Bankruptcy Law
A complete prime (pre-2005)
The Paulson Toxic Mortgage Debt Security Act: The Biggest Government Bailout of All Time
Legislative Proprosal for Treasury Authority to Purchase Mortgage-related Assets
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
Bailout Bill HR124
How to Stop Home Foreclosure
Bankruptcy can Stop Foreclosure
Pennsylvania Employment Law
alleged violations of Pennsylvania labor laws including discrimination, harassment and overtime pay.
Housing Buyer Discrimination
White homeowner settles $30,000 buyer-discrimination lawsuit.
Creditor Debt
Trophy Resources agrees to $600,000 debt settlement.
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action
Bankruptcy
helping to get you out of debt.

Robo-Signing Woman Kept Signing Docs- 13 Years After Her Death
Robo-signing Is Not Even The Big Issue
If I Sue The Debt Buyer Will They Counterclaim Against Me
Times Article: Robo-Signing Nothing New in Debt Collection










