ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> CL&P Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: CL&P Blog

Debt Buyer Dismissed

By Alan White

ADVERTISEMENTS

A Pennsylvania appeals court has affirmed the dismissal of a debt buyer lawsuit on an old credit card account, because the debt buyer could not prove the debt. The credit card agreement and account history could not be admitted under the business records exception to the hearsay Judge image rule.  The debt buyer could not testify that the credit card account records were made contemporaneously and in the regular course of the issuing bank's business. 

More importantly, the contract itself was not proven.  The debt buyer offered a standard form cardholder agreement dated seven years after the consumer's account was allegedly opened.  In addition, the interest rate charged by the debt buyer was higher than the "agreement" called for, and the "agreement" did not provide for the attorney's fees being sought. 

As many consumer attorneys know, the lack of evidence is endemic to the debt buying industry.  Pools of delinquent accounts are often sold with "media not readily available", i.e. with no account histories or signed contracts.  Given that signed cardholder agreements no longer exist, collection attorneys are often hard-pressed to produce anything that could be called a contract to support their claim.  The Federal Trade Commission issued a report on related debt buyer practices last July, but offered only recommendations directed to state courts to discourage these practices.  It remains to be seen whether the CFPB will take regulatory and enforcement action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which after all, prohibits false representations of the validity or amount of a debt, including false statements that are reckless or negligent, i.e. debt buyers alleging amounts owed based on little more than a spreadsheet they purchased for 0.6 cents on the dollar.

The Court's citation of Judge Boyko's decision dismissing foreclosure cases for similar want of proof illustrates the continuing erosion of the credibility and deference the banking industry once enjoyed with state courts.

HT to Cary Flitter.

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on February 15, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.023 secs (new cache)