Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Representing Investors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Representing InvestorsNon-Traded REITs: Brokers Love Them, Investors Not So Much
By Keith Griffin
Non-traded real estate investments trusts (REITs) like Behringer Harvard REIT and Inland Western are a big hit with independent broker/dealers and financial advisors for their high commissions - sometimes up to 15%. Meanwhile, investors who buy non-traded REITs often find themselves in the dark, unaware of how the products actually work and the potential risks they hold.
Non-traded REITs, or unlisted REITs, do not trade on national stock exchanges. When an investor wants to redeem his or her shares in a non-traded REIT, there is a specific window of time in which to do so. In most instances, the holding period associated with non-traded REITs is at least seven years.
One of the biggest challenges of non-traded REITs is a lack of transparency, as well as a lack of any publicly available analysis. Prospectus language, too, is typically vague, especially when it pertains to getting out of a non-traded REIT.
In the past year, a number of well known non-traded REITs have either slashed dividends or drastically limited their redemption programs. In response, more investors are coming forth with complaints that they were sold non-traded REITs when, in fact, they were actually looking for a safe, conservative investment - something that a non-traded REIT is most definitely not. In reality, non-traded REITs are considered high risk and illiquid.
When a non-traded REIT program decides to suspend redemptions it, in turn, will no longer buy back an investor?s shares in the REIT. This leaves investors - many of whom are counting on consistent dividends from their investment - empty-handed.
Maddox Hargett & Caruso continues to investigate the selling practices of independent broker/dealers and investment firms such as UBS, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, Morgan Keegan & Company, as well as others that may have recommended unsuitable investments in non-traded REITs to clients. If you have a story to tell about your investment losses in non-traded REITs, we encourage you to contact us.
Full post as published by Representing Investors on February 23, 2011 (boomark / email).
TouchPlay Lottery
Settles with Two More Investors
Nine Figure Settlement Approved in American Investors Life Insurance Class Action
Nine Figure Settlement Approved in American Investors Life Insurance Class Action
Mutual Fund Losses
alleging financial advisors breached fiduciary duties by not looking out for investors best interests.
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Non-Listed REITs Are Risky for Retail Investors
Non-Traded REITs May Hurt Independent Broker-Dealers That Were The Biggest Sellers To Investors
SNSFE Investigates Unlisted REITs In View Of Unsuitability And Misrepresentation Concerns
REITs Seek to Lure U.S. Pension-Fund Money From Private Equity
W>P. Carey Settles Charges of Undisclosed Brokers' Payments
Investors Should Avoid Exchange-Traded Notes








