Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> Rubin on Tax
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Taxation & Estate Planning
: Rubin on TaxTRUST INVESTMENT FEES ARE SUBJECT TO 2% DEDUCTION FLOOR
By Charles Rubin
The question of whether trust expenses for investment advisory fees are fully deductible or may be deducted only to the extent they exceed 2% of adjusted gross income has been resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court ruled that such expenses will usually be subject to the 2% floor.
The controversy came from an exception to the 2% floor for expenses "paid or incurred in connection with the administration of the estate or trust...which would not have been incurred if the property were not held in such estate or trust" and whether investment advisory fees fit within that exception. Several Circuit Court of Appeals had differed on the question.
The benchmark test adopted by the Court is whether the expense at issue is "commonly" or "customarily" incurred outside of trusts and estates - if yes, then the 2% floor applies and the exception does not. Since investment advisory fees are commonly incurred by individuals (and not just trusts and estates), they do not come within the 2% floor exception.
The Court did note that it is possible that some types of advisory fees may exclusively relate to trusts and estates, in which case the 2% floor would not apply. However, incurring advisory fees simply to comply with fiduciary "prudent investor" rules is not enough to escape the 2% floor.
While the taxpayer here did not benefit, the Court was helpful to taxpayers since it adopted a less rigorous test than that applied by the lower court in determining whether the trust and estate exception from the 2% floor applies. The lower court indicated that trust expenses would escape the 2% floor only if they were of a type that COULD NOT be incurred by an individual. The Supreme Court test is less narrow than that, and thus more expenses should qualify for the exception to the 2% floor.
Note that the IRS had issued proposed regulations that were patterned on the lower court test, essentially allowing deductions to avoid the 2% floor only if they were unique to trusts or estates. Since the Supreme Court adopted a broader test for the exception to the 2% floor for trusts and estates, revised regulations should be forthcoming.
Knight, Trustee of William L. Rudkin Testamentary Trust, Case No. 06-1286 (2008)
Full post as published by Rubin on Tax on January 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
Oil and Gas
industry workers allegedly subject to serious accident injury from hazardous conditions.
Excessive Bank Overdraft Fees
Bank Overdraft Fees alleging excessive fees and misrepresentation of account balances and more.
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
American Equity Investment Life
Settles Class Action
Atlas Cold Storage
Income Trust to pay $40 million to settle a class action that claims misrepresented financial statements.
Developer Investment
Raffaello Follieri agrees to $12 million joint venture settlement.

Supreme Court Holds Trust Investment Advisory Fees Subject to the 2% Floor
"Bundled" Fiduciary Fees Fully Deductible - For 2007
Increased Court Fees for Testamentary Trusts









