Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> Rubin on Tax
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Taxation & Estate Planning
: Rubin on TaxTHE PROS AND CONS OF MAKING GIFTS IN 2010
By Charles Rubin
With a year without estate tax, and reversion to 2001 rules in 2011, 2010 surely goes down as one of the most challenging years in transfer tax planning. One of the big issues in 2010 is whether taxpayers should be making taxable gifts. As with most planning issues, there is no cut and dried answer - the circumstances of the taxpayer need to be considered. Below are some of the key pros and cons of making taxable gifts in 2010.
PROS-With lower stock market and real estate values, the transfer value (and thus transfer costs) are likely lower than in the past.
-The maximum gift tax rate is only 35% in 2010, returning to 2001 rates in 2011. If the transferor survives three years from the date of the gift, any gift tax paid escapes transfer tax, thus reducing the maximum effective rate to below 26%.-If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, income tax rates will increase. Therefore, gifting strategies that allow income to accrue in lower rate taxpayers will be more valuable than in the past.
-With a low interest rate environment, many gifting strategies produce lower gifts than in high interest rate years.-Direct gifts to lower generations, as opposed to gifts to generation skipping trusts, may be more favored in 2010 than in other years due to uncertain availability of generation skipping tax exclusion ratio benefits for transfers to trusts.
CONS-If the transferor dies in 2010, no gift tax would apply. Therefore, unnecessary transfer taxes are incurred. However, this risk can be minimized by waiting to complete gifts until very close to the end of the year. This also allows for more flexibility should Congress change the transfer tax laws prior to the end of 2010.
Full post as published by Rubin on Tax on July 30, 2010 (boomark / email).
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.

The Non-traditional Dean: A Growing Trend Pros & Cons
The Pros and Cons of Investing in China
"Supreme Court Contenders: Pros and Cons."
Short list of pros and cons of online legal research
The Pros and Cons of Vertical Restraints
Pros and Cons of 'Backing Winners' in Innovation Policy









