Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Solo Practice Blogs -> Build A Solo Practice, LLC
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Solo Practice
: Build A Solo Practice, LLCBuy Your Law Firm Domain Name NOW ..and Trademark...Before Someone Else Does
I've written on this before but it never fails to amaze me that lawyers don't buy their internet real estate now before it's too late. But here's the twist. If you haven't purchased it and are using a name you wish to trademark, better trademark your name, too, if you want a chance to get your domain name back from a cybersquatter. Using it on letterhead, business cards and communications is not enough to stake a claim and win.
Have you trademarked your law firm name? If not, it's a big mistake and invites cyber-squatters to buy a domain, hijacking your firm name. Just because you've been using your law firm name on stationery and marketing materials may not be enough to create a common-law trademark for you.
Larry Bodine talks about a 65-lawyer firm which just lost their suit to get their domain name for their firm transferred from a cybersquatter because they failed to trademark their firm's name.
Look what happened to GableGotwals, a 65-lawyer firm in Tulsa, OK.
A National Arbitration Forum decision denied the law firm's demand that the domain name gablegotwals.com be transferred to them, and refused to take it away from Schlund+Partner Ag, a cyber squatter based in Naples, FL. The ruling was Gable & Gotwals, Inc. d/b/a GableGotwals v. Dave Jackson, Claim Number: FA0806001212305.
The law firm had been using the GABLEGOTWALS mark in commerce since January 1, 2006, by using its name on letterhead and marketing materials. The firm demanded that the domain name be transferred to it. Yet the law firm lost even thought the cybersquatter failed to respond to the complaint!
The squatter registered the gablegotwals.com domain name on August 26, 2006 and has a placeholder site online, saying that a real web site is "coming soon."
However, the decision said, '[a]lthough it has been held that there is no requisite showing to establish common law rights, common sense dictates that something beyond mere proof of business establishment is necessary.' I
Cybersquatting is big business and this case is illustrative of what's to come for many unsuspecting law firms and solo practitioners who don't do so. Here is an interview with Enrico Schaefer about the law and how to go about trademarking your business name.
And here is another great post on this topic called 'Define Yourself" authored by Brett Trout who tweets,
"Yes. Lawyers need to define themselves before the internet defines them & sends new business packing"
Do it today.
Related Links:
Full post as published by Build A Solo Practice, LLC on October 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Adidas Imitators
Payless Shoesource to pay $304.6 million settlement in trademark lawsuit.
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
Colorado Firm Recalls Beef Products
Due To Possible E. coli Contamination
South Carolina Firm
Recalls Frozen Meat and Poultry Products
Firm Associate
Attorney Jay Wingate ordered to pay widow $2.5 million settlement for collected legal fees.
Network Solutions and ICANN
allegedly registers searched domain names to prevent others from selling and forces customers to pay expensive fees.

Cybersquatting and Domain Name Dispute Lawyers
Domain Name URL Does Not Infringe Trademark
Domain Path Name Does Not Violate Trademark
Trademark Registration of Domain Names
UDRP: Lack of Use of a Domain is NOT Always a Defense








