Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Mirror of Justice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Mirror of JusticeA new paper, hopefully of interest ...
... to Rick Garnett and to many other MOJ readers (and to their families and friends):
The Right to Moral Freedom
Emory University School of Law; University of San Diego - School of Law and Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies (2009-2012)
August 10, 2009
Abstract:
At the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), the celebrated American Jesuit
John Courtney Murray played a leading role, as is well known, in
persuading the magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church--the bishops
and, ultimately, the pope--to embrace the right to religious freedom.
Murray was concerned with more than just religious freedom, however; he
was also concerned with what we may call moral freedom. In 1960, the
year in which the first and, so far, only Catholic was elected to the
presidency of the United States, Murray's published We Hold These
Truths: Catholic Reflections on the American Proposition. Murray
wrote, in that now-famous book, that "the moral aspirations of the law
are minimal. Laws seek to establish and maintain only that minimum of
actualized morality that is necessary for the healthy functioning of
the social order." According to Murray, the law should "not look to
what is morally desirable, or attempt to remove every moral taint from
the atmosphere of society. It [should] enforce[] only what is minimally
acceptable, and in this sense socially necessary."
"But
why should 'the moral aspirations of the law' be only 'minimal'," we
may fairly ask. "Why should 'laws seek to establish and maintain only
that minimum of actualized morality that is necessary for the healthy
functioning of the social order'? Why should the law 'enforce only what
is minimally acceptable, and in this sense socially necessary'?" In
this essay I provide an answer, in the course of defending this claim:
The case for liberal democracy's affirming the right to moral freedom
is analogous to and no less compelling than the case for its affirming,
as it does, the right to religious freedom. Liberal democracy should
affirm the former right, therefore, as well as the latter; it should
affirm moral freedom as well as religious freedom.
This essay is
drawn from my book The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy, which
will be published in 2010 by the Cambridge University Press.
[You can download the paper--free of charge!--here.]
Full post as published by Mirror of Justice on August 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.
JP Morgan Chase & Co
Faces Lawsuit Over Hikes in Credit Card Interest Rate
Tax Discrepancies
Northwest Airlines pays IRS $12.6 million settlement for taxes and interest.
Teachers Paid
LA School District pays 8% interest to teachers for payroll problems.
Auto Financing
Credit Acceptance Corp. agrees to $52.1 million class action settlement after overcharging consumers for fees and interest on automobile installment contracts.
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

Another Paper for the Institutionalists Among Us
Questions on Paper Assignments
"Moral Skepticism and Moral Disagreement in Nietzsche"
Economic Analysis of Hub Dominance
Does disclosure solve the conflicts problem
Article of Interest: "Lifting the Floor: Sex, Class and Education"








