Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct

Religion & Law

: Constitutionally Correct

Traditional marriage: Is it really indefensible?

By ADF Alliance Alert

Charles A. Donovan writes at the Bellingham Herald: "However, the decision to openly switch sides comes midstream in the judicial process. That creates real uncertainty about who will represent the Congress of the United States and the law before the courts. Our judicial system depends completely on a genuine adversarial process. The courts do not accept controversies unless they are just that: important legal matters about which the contending parties deeply disagree. This holds for criminal cases as well as for issues of statutory and constitutional law. When one side of a case is actively helping the other, or putting up a token defense, the courts and the people of the United States suffer a grave disservice. Even more offensive is the fact that, while serving up this legal surrender, the president and his team are slandering millions of Americans who clearly disagree with redefining marriage."

Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on March 02, 2011 (boomark / email).