Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Mirror of Justice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Mirror of JusticeWhy Embryonic Stem Cell research?
I have wondered why funding for embryonic stem cell research is such a high priority for some, given its lack of positive results, the positive results of alternatives, and the serious ethical questions involved. Yesterday, Lisa linked to Denise Hunnell's blog post discussing Pres. Obama's order regarding funding for embryonic stem cell research. This is Denise's theory:
Embryonic Stem Cell Research is promoted by those who support abortion. If one affords any dignity to the human embryo in the laboratory, then the morality of abortion can be called into question. Therefore, it is in the interest of preserving the perception of abortion as a moral right that human embryos are afforded no special status in the laboratory.
And, I would agree with her, but I am not sure she takes it far enough. Despite headlines that said that Pres. Obama closes the door on cloning, I suspect that part of the end game is cloning. (To be clear, I am not saying that the President was being dishonest - I don't know what he really thinks about cloning). Several years ago, I was in the car listening to the Diane Rehm show. Richard Doerflinger of the USCCB was one of the guests and the other guest was someone high up in the Juvenile Diabetes Association - (is this now the JDRF?). Doerflinger made the statement that even if the government funded embryonic stem cell research, there were not enough stem cell lines available to do the research and that cloning (which he opposed) would become necessary. I thought that even if the JDRF spokesperson agreed with Doerflinger and would acknowledge agreement in the JDRF board room, he would deny it publicly . Much to my surprise, he agreed publicly with Doerflinger. The conversation remains vivid in my mind because I was shocked to hear a spokesperson for this organization, which relies I would guess on public support and good will, could without fear of retribution openly advocate cloning - or what they would call "theraputic closing." JDRF's website says that they oppose a permanent ban on human therapeutic cloning."
Is Denise Hunnell off base here? Am I? Why?
Full post as published by Mirror of Justice on March 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
New Study Links Cell Phone Radiation to Increased Health Risks
Cell Phone Radiation Is Your Phone Toxic?
$8 Million from Rezulin Class Action
Will Go to Medical Research
Fidelity Management & Research Company
401k / ERISA Stock Fraud
Verizon Settles Cell Phone Billing Class Action for $90 Million
Verizon Settles Cell Phone Class Action for $90 Million
Samsung
Recalls Jitterbug Cell Phones
Cell Phone Use
Can Increase Risk of Brain Cancer 5 Times

CIRM walks a tightrope on iPS research
Vatican cardinal says Obama embryonic stem cell policy change good for nothing
Obama soon plans to reverse Bushs order on embryonic stem cell research
Arlen Specter Reaffirms McCains Support for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Catholic Bishops Approve Statement Opposing Embryonic Stem Cell Research








