Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct

Religion & Law

: Constitutionally Correct

Differences between non-embryonic and embryonic stem cells

By Alliance Alert

Dr. Jan F. Dudt, Jonathan D. Moore, and Dr. Durwood B. Ray write in Philadelphia's Bulletin: "Christians committed to the sanctity of human life should look with favor on technologies that preserve and/or improve human life. Consequently, non-embryonic stem-cell advances should be embraced when they: 1) respect the consent and preserve the dignity of the stem-cell donors, 2) enhance the health of the stem-cell recipient, and 3) protect human life at every stage of development. Embryonic stem-cell harvesting remains problematic because the procedure destroys the smallest and most helpless members of the human family: embryos."

Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on July 10, 2009 (boomark / email).