ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> National Eminent Domain Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Real Estate & Property Law

: National Eminent Domain Blog

Monroe County Taking

By Alan Ackerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

Register Herald

The Monroe County Commission is attempting to obtain ownership of a cemetery, using its powers of eminent domain, because the private owner allegedly has “desecrated the burial ground” by removing tombstones and allowing “raw sewage” to run over graves.

Commissioners Oliver Porterfield, Joyce Pritt and Shane Ashley named Irvin Lee Mann Jr. as the defendant in a lawsuit filed last week that seeks the more than 30,000-square-foot property in Lindside.

The suit states the plot of land is an old cemetery where human remains were last interred in 1914. The commission is seeking to take the property from Mann, pay him for fair market value for it and then restore the cemetery “for the solemn and respectful final resting place for the citizens therein buried.”

“Upon information and belief all grave markers were removed from existing graves in violation of law, and discarded or destroyed, it is believed that some markers may exist over a steep wooded embankment adjoining the cemetery,” the suit states.

“The property has been illegally utilized for residential purposes for some time, and has been recently used by (Mann) as a resident with residential rental structure also on the property.

“... (Mann) has unlawfully allowed raw untreated sewage to run unattended over and across the cemetery property, further desecrating the burial ground.”

A telephone listing for Mann could not be found Thursday.

Ashley said some of the problems with the cemetery began with previous owners of the land, and believes the matter needs to be resolved out of respect for those who are buried there.

“What the commission wants to do is to come in and clean it up and restore it back to the original cemetery and make it presentable and a good resting place for the people that are buried there,” he said Thursday. “I am for protecting the cemetery where somebody’s mother or father may be buried.”

Ashley said he was unsure how many grave sites there are or their exact names, but said, “I’m pretty sure we can work this out.”

The lawsuit also stated the commission does not intend to “create new sites for burials, but only to prevent the further violations of existing graves.”

This is a taking for all the good reasons. There is no difference between an eminent domain proceeding for a disgustingly maintained cemetery and a blighted building. Hopefully, there is a statutory delegation allowing the taking the property.

Full post as published by National Eminent Domain Blog on May 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/04/26 10:44:49)