Public Defense
: A Public DefenderW(h)ither Miranda?
A new paper asks the very question: Has Miranda become ineffective? Not because it’s not needed anymore, but because police departments are finding ways to get around it while achieving the same results. The conclusion is pretty bleak:
So how well do Miranda?s safeguards fare overall? I believe that we have a Miranda rule that is somewhat limited in reach, that sometimes locates warnings and waivers within the heart of a highly-structured interrogation process, that provides admonitions that many suspects do not understand, and that appears not to afford many suspects a meaningful way to assert their Fifth Amendment rights. As a prophylactic device to protect suspects? privilege against self incrimination, I believe that Miranda is largely dead. I would welcome compelling evidence to the contrary (or proof that California is a complete outlier), but I do not believe such evidence exists.
This paper does an excellent analysis of the Court’s decision in Miranda and subsequent decisions that defined gutted its meaning and scope:
But a primary virtue of Miranda is, in theory, giving clear guidance and bright line rules to police, judges and prosecutors, thus avoiding difficult individualized assessments. Thus, it is not so much that the Court has retreated after Miranda but rather that the one-size-fits-all safeguards put in place by the Miranda Court could never have functioned as intended. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say that a far higher proportion of defendants than the Court initially anticipated have been left uninformed and unempowered by form warnings.
So whither Miranda? Will it provide more benefit to abandon Miranda? The paper suggests legislative action:
One possible outcome might be legislation that directly regulates the police and affords greater protection to suspects than Miranda currently offers, perhaps in conjunction with a modified system of warnings. A legislature might, for example, require warnings in very simple language and instruct police to give them prior to any suspect interviews or interrogations. It could require that all interrogations be videotaped, a movement that is slowly gaining ground.
H/T: Appellate.
Update: I should have checked before posting. SimpleJustice also has some thoughts.
Full post as published by A Public Defender on February 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Has Miranda Outlived Its Usefulness?
Lawprof Charles Weisselberg's new article, Mourning Miranda, raises some very interesting questions about how a good thing can go south over time...
Mourning Miranda:
Berkeley lawprof Charles Weisselberg has posted a fascinating new draft article, Mourning Miranda, on how the police in California currently implement the Miranda warnings...
CA1: a normal restart of questioning Miranda problem
US v. Lugo-Guerrero, No. 06-2745 affirms a conviction. The big issue is whether un-Mirandized statements were improperly admitted...
When Are Miranda Warnings Required?
Many people who have grown up watching TV mistakenly believe that the police must always give a person Miranda warnings as soon as they begin speaking with him...
Weisselberg on Miranda
Charles D. Weisselberg (University of California, Berkeley - School of Law (Boalt Hall)) has posted Mourning Miranda (California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN...
Lost in Translation
There is an interesting article in the Summer 2008 edition of the Criminal Justice Magazine (Vol...
Must a criminal suspect be read their mirana rights before being asked by the police for a confession?
before any questioning can take place for a criminal offence that you are being...

Must a criminal suspect be read their mirana rights before being asked by the police for a confession?
before any questioning can take place for a criminal offence that you are being...








