ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Open Congress

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Politics

: Open Congress

Senate Dems Block a DeMint Amendment to Audit the Fed

By Sunlight Foundation & Participatory Politics Foundation

ADVERTISEMENTS

As I’ve mentioned several times on this blog, Rep. Ron Paul [R, TX-14] has a bill in the House to audit the Federal reserve that has attracted 244 bipartisan co-sponsors, which is more than half of the entire House. The bill is significant for a couple of reasons. First, Paul, who is best known for opposing just about everything Congress does, rarely ever sees support from his colleagues for his legislation, let alone overwhelming and bipartisan support. Secondly, the Federal Reserve is notoriously secretive; it has successfully avoided government audits for the last 50 years.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Barney Frank [D, MA-4] is tentatively supporting the bill and has indicated that there will be hearings. My guess is that the bill will even get a vote in the House before this session of Congress is through. But it’s prospects in the Senate are much, much dimmer.

Yesterday, Sen. Jim DeMint [R, SC] attempted to bring the bill to a vote in the Senate in the form of an amendment to the Legislative Branch Appropriations bill, but Sen. Ben Nelson [D, NE], likely acting on behalf of the Democratic leadership, blocked the amendment, citing a parliamentary rule banning legislation on appropriations bills. But, as Demint proceeded to point out, the underlying appropriations bill already contains several provisions that are undeniably legislative in nature.

Watch the video below. DeMint’s line of questioning and the answers he gets from the acting Senate President pro tempore make it clear that the amendment wasn’t blocked for parliamentary reasons, but because of its content:

Full post as published by Open Congress on July 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 13:53:57)