ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Open Congress

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Politics

: Open Congress

Progress for 9/11 First Responders' Health Care Bill

By Sunlight Foundation & Participatory Politics Foundation

ADVERTISEMENTS

The James Zadroga 9/11 Health Compensation Act, which would help first responders at Ground Zero who were exposed to dangerous toxins access medical care, has been kicking around Congress for nearly two years. It finally passed the House earlier this fall, but it was recently filibustered by Republicans in the Senate.

Now, the Republicans didn’t filibuster this because they hate 9/11 rescue workers. And it’s actually not because it would add to the deficit either. It’s fully offset. The reason Republicans filibustered the bill is because it would have financed the new health benefits by closing a loophole that allows companies to incorporate in tax havens and avoid paying taxes on business they conduct in the U.S.

If you look at the money trail behind the bill, the two organizations that have come out against it are very influential Republicans groups — the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Americans for Tax Reform. In September, the Chamber wrote to Congress asking them to vote against the bill because the tax provision it would “discourage foreign investment in the United States” and “aggravate already unsettled financial markets.”

So Democrats are now changing the bill by taking out the tax-loophole closer, reducing the amount of benefits that would be available for first responders, and adding new pay-fors. According to the AP, “the new bill would be paid for with a fee on some foreign firms that get U.S. government procurement contracts. The bill also calls for extending fees on certain firms that rely on H-1B and L-1 visas. It would also extend fees on travelers who don’t present visa travel documents at U.S. airports.”

New York Senators Kirsten Gillibrand [D] and Chuck Schumer [D] are optimistic that the changes will be enough to get this bill past Republican opposition and through the Senate before the session ends. According to Schumer, a vote will be held on Wednesday, right after the Senate finishes debate of the nuclear arms treaty with Russia, and he’s urging the House to stay in session until after the Senate votes so they can give the revised version final passage and send it to Obama for his signature.

Full post as published by Open Congress on December 20, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/01/26 00:15:20)