ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Sunlight Foundation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Politics

: Sunlight Foundation

No Country for Self-Funders

By Paul Blumenthal

ADVERTISEMENTS

I wonder if folks at the @sunfoundation realize they’re creating a system where only billionaires can get elected — Patrick Ruffini

That was a tweet sent the way of the Sunlight Foundation yesterday by transparency friend Patrick Ruffini. The only possible explanation I have for it is that Ruffini is criticizing our position on the DISCLOSE Act. I’m assuming that this is some new argument by the money equals speech crowd that if corporations and unions, who couldn’t advocate directly for the election or defeat of a lawmaker from between 1990 and 2010, suddenly found their new right to political spending tied up with disclosure requirements than non-billionaire candidates won’t run because they can’t afford to and so on and so on.

This is a terribly tired and poorly thought out argument. I expect better from the anti-DISCLOSE Act crowd.

From the point of view of Ruffini the period between 1990 and 2010, when direct corporate and union spending on electoral appeals was banned, must have been a far more draconian time than a potential future era where this advocacy is allowed but required to be disclosed. The suggestion that only billionaires can get elected implies that candidates will need to self-fund their campaigns. How did self-funders do in the elections during this most oppressed period?

(The most readily available data comes from the 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 elections. We’ll have to just look at those years for now. And by self-funder, I mean someone who contributed a substantial amount of their own money to their campaign.)

In 2002 three out of thirty-two self-funding candidates for Congress won election. That’s a 9.37 percent success rate.

In 2004 a whopping one out of thirty self-funders won election to Congress. An even less impressive 3.33 percent success rate.

In 2006 five out of forty-two self-funders were elected. A more favorable 11.9 percent election rate.

The best year for self-funders by far was 2008 when eleven out of fifty-one won election. That’s a 21.56 percent success rate.

Out of the past four elections only 13 percent of all self-funders were elected to Congress. None of them were billionaires.

I guess you don’t have to be a billionaire to get elected. I don’t think that the imposition of disclosure requirements on activity that was illegal for twenty years is going to change that.

Full post as published by Sunlight Foundation on August 09, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/04/26 09:10:03)