ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Open Congress

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Politics

: Open Congress

An Amendment to Break up the Big Banks

By Sunlight Foundation & Participatory Politics Foundation

ADVERTISEMENTS

There has been an ongoing partisan spat in the Senate recently over whether or not the financial reform bill as prepared by Sen. Chris Dodd [D, CT] would actually end bailouts. Politifact has shown that Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell’s [R, KY] statement that the bill “actually guarantees future bailouts of Wall Street banks” is false, but there is more ambiguity over whether the resolution authority provision in the bill is actually strong enough to guarantee that there will never again be bailouts of too-big-to-fail banks.

Senators Sherrod Brown [D, OH], Ted Kaufman [D, DE], Bob Casey [D, PA] and Sheldon Whitehouse [D, RI] today announced that they are proposing legislation that I think everyone can agree would end once and for all the problem of having to bail out failing banks that are too big to fail. The legislation, which will be introduced next week as an amendment to the financial reform bill, is called the SAFE Banking Act. It would restore a strict 10% cap on any banks’ share of overall deposits, set a 6% leverage limit for banks, and cap the maximum-amount of non-deposit assets that a bank can hold at 2% (non-bank financial companies would have a 3% cap). The amendment would cause the breaking up of a handful of the currently largest banks.

To give you a sense of just how big the big banks have become (they’re bigger now than they were when they were first determined to be too big to fail), check out the graph on the right from Baseline Scenario’s James Kwak. It shows that the top 6 banks now hold assets equal to more than 60% of total GDP (Source: Rortybomb).

Will Senate Republicans support this amendment to strengthen the resolution authority provision in Dodd’s bill? Will the Democrats vote for it even though it would be seen as a tacit admission that the Dodd bill isn’t strong enough? Will either party be able to overcome the influence of the enormous amount of money they receive from the finance sector each year? This is going to be a big vote, we’ll be updating as it becomes clearer where the support is on this.

Full post as published by Open Congress on April 22, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 11/03/26 20:15:48)