ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Phoenix Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Phoenix Personal Injury Lawyer

Safety Testing Challenge - Drugs During Preganncy

By Michael Monheit

ADVERTISEMENTS

There is a real challenge when it comes to the ethics of testing the side effects of drugs that are taken during pregnancy. On the one hand, it is necessary to know the side effects and whether it is safe to take a drug, especially during pregnancy. On the other hand, is it ethical to expose an innocent and otherwise healthy fetus to the potential side effects of the drug. What to do?

The result is that little is done in the way of pre-market testing. That is, most drugs are not tested to determine if they are safe for the unborn. This means that there is a critical need to actively follow up with post market data collection and to aggressively look at that data to determine if there are dangerous side effects for the unborn child. It is important to gather this data accurately, and to act upon it quickly.

Such is the case with the recent analysis of data on Proton-Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) which are commonly given as a treatment for heart burn and acid reflux. Data from Denmark, that included every live-born infant in the country from 2005-2008, was reviewed to determine if there was an increase in birth defects as a result of antenatal exposure to PPI drugs. The study looked at 840,000 births and accounted for many potential confounding factors. With this large data set, the authors of the study determined that there is not likely to be any association between the use of PPIs and birth defects. This preliminary data is reassuring for those who have taken or are taking PPI drugs during pregnancy.

The findings are considered "preliminary" for a couple of reasons. Most importantly is that the authors were looking at all birth defects, which would mask a possible increase in any one birth defect. This is significant because, when a birth defect is caused by a drug, usually it is a specific birth defect (e.g. heart problems in the case of Paxil). Other reasons that these results need to be considered preliminary are that not all confounding factors were accounted for, and many different PPI drugs were included in the study. Again, both of these factors could mask any side effects of a particular drug or for a particular condition.

In conclusion, the authors found that:

In this large cohort, exposure to PPIs during the first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with a significantly increased risk of major birth defects. (Funded by the Danish Medical Research Council and the Lundbeck Foundation.)

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Michael Monheit

Full post as published by Phoenix Personal Injury Lawyer on November 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/01/26 01:08:14)