Personal Injury Law

Police Chase Cases and Innocent Passengers

Since the seminal case of Scott v. Harris as decided by the U. S. Supreme Court there seems to be a prevailing mood that ?the gloves are off? and the police can chase a suspect who defies their orders to pull over for as long as possible notwithstanding the dangers to the public. Fortunately, even though this has been the reading by some of the Supreme Court Opinion, the legal landscape is hardly as bleak as some would think. Indeed, state laws like that enacted by the Georgia Legislature (O.C.G.A. § 40-6-6) still provide protections for innocent members of the motoring public when the chasing police officer fails to exercise ?due regard? for the safety of the motoring public. An interesting question arises, however, when the police claim that they have a need to chase a fleeing suspect notwithstanding the dangers to the motoring public. While this may be true in some cases with respect to the suspect himself the question arises as to what should be done in the context of a fleeing suspect when he or she has in their vehicle passengers who may be completely unconnected with the reasons for the chase.

A typical example of what we are concerned about is the situation in which a teenage driver with teenage friends in his car is asked to pull over by a police officer. For whatever reason, the teenage driver decides to take off. The teenage driver may be driving without a license, he may be joy riding, he may be on juvenile probation, he may be in violation of his parents orders to return home at a certain time, etc. In short, teenage drivers are known to panic for a variety of reason unconnected with their danger to the public. And yet, if the police decide to chase such a suspect, not only are they endangering the fleeing suspect?s life and other members of the motoring public, they are clearly endangering the rights of the passengers trapped inside the vehicle.

We have been involved in several cases dealing with trapped passengers. Passengers in vehicles do not know what the driver may or may not have done in all cases. In some cases, the passengers may be in on the criminal acts being investigated by the police. In many other cases, however, there may be no evidence whatsoever that the passengers in the vehicle have done anything wrong and yet because they are trapped inside the vehicle, they are exposed to the risk of death by the police as chases continue in some cases for miles. We continue to believe that passengers like other third parties involved in these chases have rights which must be recognized by police. If the police have a reason to chase a suspect, so be it, however, when the danger to the public caused by the chase itself exceeds the danger to the public caused by the suspect?s alleged transgressions, then in that event, the police must exercise due regard for the rights of passengers just as they must exercise due regard for the safety of innocent third party motorists.

The cases that seem to attract the most attention in this area are those involving deaths to pedestrians and other third parties who have no involvement whatsoever in the chase and are simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Such cases are obviously very tragic. However, innocent passengers trapped in a vehicle are just as likely to be innocent victims of police chases as are innocent third party motorists unconnected to the chase. Innocent passengers have rights that must be recognized by the police. Until and unless the police factor those rights into the calculus of making the determination whether the dangers presented by the chase are justified, tragedies will continue to occur, passenger?s rights will continue to be ignored, and deaths involving innocent passengers will continue unabated. The fact that our firm is currently handling 2 separate cases involving passengers killed in chases for non-violent offenses allegedly committed by the driver is evidence of this.

Full post as published by Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog on July 07, 2008 (boomark / email).