Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Drug and Device Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Drug and Device LawThe New Voice In The Blogosphere
By James M. Beck and Mark Herrmann
(Lord knows, we can use all the help we can get.)
So we welcome aboard our new visitors who came through this link from Russell Jackson's Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts blog (but it's two n's in Herrmann, Russell).
We're also delighted to be spared the effort of writing up Williams v. Nidek Co., Ltd., 2009 WL 226024 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. Feb. 2, 2009), in which the California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of class certification in a case involving people who had undergone Lasik surgeries to correct far-sightedness, and had not suffered personal injuries. Russell writes up the case here, and we're delighted to rely on that analysis and save ourselves the effort of thinking about it separately.
Full post as published by Drug and Device Law on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Automated Calls
Voice Mail Broadcasting Corp. pays $180,000 FTC settlement for telemarketing violations.









