Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> I/P Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: I/P UpdatesNo "Joint Infringement" Without Proof of Vicarious Liability
By William F. Heinze
to incur liability for direct infringement by the combined actions of multiple parties for a method claim directed to

an "integrated system on a single server? that allows issuers to run the auction
and bidders to prepare and submit bids using a conventional web browser, without
the use of other separate software. Id. at col.5 ll.13?28. The system of the ?099 patent also allows issuers to monitor the progress of the auction and allows bidders to monitor their bid vis-à-vis the current best bid. Id. at col.12 l.60 to col.13 l.60.
Thomson itself can be said to have performed every step of the asserted claims:
Under BMC v. PaymenTech, the control or direction standard is satisfied in situations where the law would traditionally hold the accused direct infringer vicariously liable for the acts committed by another party that are required to complete performance of a claimed method. 498 F.3d at 1379; accord Int?l Rectifier v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 361 F.3d 1355, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (reversing district court?s ruling that Samsung violated a permanent injunction prohibiting infringement in the United States on the grounds that Samsung did not control or participate in the extraterritorial
activities of a third party such that the acts of the third party were not attributable to Samsung). In this case, Thomson neither performed every step of the claimed methods nor had another party perform steps on its behalf, and Muniauction has identified no legal theory under which Thomson might be vicariously liable for the actions of the bidders. Therefore, Thomson does not infringe the asserted claims as a matter of law.
Full post as published by I/P Updates on July 14, 2008 (boomark / email).
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Developer Investment
Raffaello Follieri agrees to $12 million joint venture settlement.
Joint Venture
Gallaher Group agrees to pay Reynolds American $387 million contract dispute settlement.
Dog Bites
alleging liability for personal injuries caused.
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Spike Lee and Showtime
Settlement reached in script copyright infringement lawsuit.
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.

More expert commentary on Exxon Valdez -- Sturley on vicarious liability
Employer Vicarious Liability For Sexual Harassment
AFRC Appeal: Joint Criminal Enterprise
The Bryan Funeral Home and Vicarious Responsibility
Pledge Problems at Phi Mu:University of New Hampshire Suspends Fraternity







