Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesHow to Effectively Litigate a Case of Active Inducement
By Philip Brooks
As mentioned in my January 7, 2008 post, H. Keeto Sabharwal and Melissa D. Pierre of Blank Rome LLP presented "How to Effectively Litigate a Case of Active Inducement" at the Advanced Patent Law Institute.
35 U.S.C. § 271(b) states, ?Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer."
- Allows patentee to sue entities that sell products used to practice a claimed method even though defendant does not directly infringe that claim
- E.g., instruction manuals, brochures, website information, product labels
- Imposes the same level of liability on a person or entity who induces infringement as it does on direct infringers
Two Requirements for Finding Inducement:
- A showing that the conduct being induced is, in fact, a direct infringement; and
- Proof of intent
See the full presentation (Download 50346830_1.PPT).
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on January 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

2008 Advanced Patent Law Institute
Opinion of Counsel Relative to Question of Active Inducement
"Can Women Litigate and Procreate"
Can Women Litigate and Procreate








