Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizControlling already-created innovation?
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
Another example of confusion between the concepts of invention and of innovation.
Full post as published by IPBiz on August 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Law and Economics of Innovation: Patents and the Commercialization of Innovation
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol George Mason University School of Law and Microsoft Corporation announce the second in an annual series of conferences The Law and Economics of Innovation: Patents and the Commercialization of Innovation May 15, 2008, Arlington, VA...
Nguyen & Maine: Acquiring Innovation
Xuan-Thao Nguyen (SMU) & Jeffrey A. Maine (Maine) have published Acquiring Innovation, 57 Am. U. L. Rev. 775 (2008). Here is the Conclusion: A robust innovation acquisition market fosters desirable innovation development at the lower strata, comprised mostly of small...
Announcement: Patents and the Commercialization of Innovation
Here is a heads-up on what promises to be an interesting Conference coming up in May: The Law and Economics of Innovation: Patents and the Commercialization of Innovation May 15, 2008, Arlington, VA The George Mason/Microsoft Conference Series on the Law and Economics of Innovation will bring together leading academics to present [...
The Role of HR in Innovation
There's a superb post called The role of HR in innovation by Jeffrey Phillips at Innovate on Purpose blog that anyone in HR or business should check out. Thanks to the good folks over at Innovation Weblog for the pointer...
Review of Australia's national innovation system
The Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, Senator Kim Carr, has announced a review of Australia's national innovation system. The Review Panel will identify gaps and weaknesses in the innovation system and develop proposals to address them...
District Court Must Provide Underlying Reasoning For "Exceptional Case" Determination
Innovation Technologies v. Splash! Medical Devices (Fed. Cir. 2008) Innovation holds a patent for washing flesh wounds (U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,197) and sued Splash for infringement. In the midst of discovery (but before a Markman hearing) Innovation decided to end...









